Harmonizing GHG Emissions Reporting: Aligning GRI and ISSB Standards

In the evolving landscape of corporate sustainability reporting, the alignment of various standards is crucial for ensuring consistent and comparable disclosures. The report "Interoperability Considerations for GHG Emissions When Applying GRI Standards and ISSB Standards" offers an insightful analysis into the convergence of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) 305 and International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) IFRS S2 standards. This article delves into the key findings and practical implications for companies striving to meet both standards.

Introduction: The Need for Interoperability

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions reporting is fundamental for companies aiming to demonstrate their environmental impact. Both GRI 305: Emissions and IFRS S2: Climate-related Disclosures provide frameworks for such reporting, each with a distinct focus. GRI standards emphasize the broader stakeholder impacts, while ISSB standards cater primarily to investor needs. The interoperability between these standards is pivotal for comprehensive and transparent reporting.

Key Alignments Between GRI 305 and IFRS S2

The analysis highlights significant alignments between GRI 305 and IFRS S2, particularly in the disclosure of Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 GHG emissions. Both standards require the reporting of gross GHG emissions in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent, covering the same greenhouse gases, and utilizing similar measurement approaches (equity share, operational control, and financial control).

For instance, both standards mandate the disclosure of location-based emissions for Scope 2 and detailed categorization for Scope 3 emissions. This alignment simplifies the process for companies already compliant with one standard to adapt to the other.

Additional Disclosures and Specific Requirements

While GRI 305 and IFRS S2 share many commonalities, they also have unique requirements. GRI 305 calls for the disclosure of market-based Scope 2 emissions, biogenic CO2 emissions, and specific gases included in emissions calculations, which are not explicitly required by IFRS S2. Conversely, IFRS S2 necessitates additional disclosures such as the disaggregation of emissions by the consolidated accounting group and other investees, and detailed information about contractual instruments affecting Scope 2 emissions.

Methodologies and Practical Considerations

A notable point of convergence is the reliance on the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard for measuring GHG emissions. This standard serves as the backbone for both GRI 305 and IFRS S2, ensuring a harmonized approach to GHG accounting. However, companies must remain vigilant about the specific methodological choices and justifications required by each standard. For instance, IFRS S2 emphasizes the need to disclose the reasoning behind chosen measurement approaches, which can influence how companies prepare their reports.

Challenges and Opportunities

The alignment of GRI 305 and IFRS S2 offers several benefits, including enhanced credibility and comparability of GHG emissions data. However, it also presents challenges, such as the need for companies to navigate and reconcile the nuances of each standard. The ability to align disclosures across these frameworks can significantly bolster a company’s transparency and appeal to both investors and stakeholders.

‍

‍